One of the largest builders in GTA is behind an alleged wrong doing.
The builder has constructed a Complex and retained a stake in the project, following completion. The builder controls the board of directors of the Complex. (exercises complete control over the management of the complex which is partially owned by hundreds of other purchasers not related to him)
Many questions related to non-arms’ length arrangements as well as other violations which appear to financially benefit the builder, are facilitated by the group of lawyers go unanswered.
Hundreds of Canadians who bought units in the project are financially devastated.
They massively refinance their homes to support the failing project, many may loose their property.
Meanwhile, The Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) repeatedly closes complaints against lawyers involved with the builder without addressing the underlying concerns, but simply misinterpreting omitting and closing those concerns. The LSUC then sends out letters to these lawyers indicating that no suspicion in misconduct was noted. Those letters (with the stamp of LSUC) would then protect these lawyers against any future litigation.
The builder has been privately investigated for 2.5 years.The massive reports resulting from this investigation will be published shortly.
LETTER TO CEO, UPPER MANAGEMENT OF LSUC ASKING FOR HELP:
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 7:52 AM
To: 'GWedge@lsuc.on.ca'; ‘Entire Upper Management of LSUC’
Subject: RE: Case Nos. 2015-174275, 2015-174179 and 2016-185541. LSUC DAMAGES ME
Dear Mr. Lapper, Dear upper Management Of LSUC.
Mr. Lapper, I request your personal undivided attention to the following facts, and the way LSUC damaged me in #6. Please respond to me. Please review previous documents I provided to you and listed in the email as of May 1, 2016.
1. I have asked LSUC to act immediately in a time sensitive grave public matter. (Sep 2015) <Exhibit was attached>
2. In response, LSUC repeatedly misinterpreted, omitted and closed my complaints. (Sep 2015-to Mar 2016). (Reference #1) <Exhibit was attached>
3. I have asked Mr. Lapper and management for help. I have provided them with proof of misinterpretations and omissions; I have asked them to review the files personally. (reference #2)
4. In response, you provided no explanation to undue and systematic closing my complaints. You referred me back to the system, for the 5th review by same individual who reviewed my complaint prior being misinterpreted, omitted and closed for the 4th time. (reference #3)<Exhibit was attached>
5.<Removed for privacy reasons>
6. Letters from LSUC advising me on closing of my files for the 4th time were based on misinterpretations and omissions of my concerns. Those letters were also CCed to the subjects <Lawyers alleged in wrong doing>. Hence, the LSUC has produced and distributed dishonest documentation which can be used (by subjects) to facilitate obstruction to administration of justice. Hence, LSUC deprived me of my right to fair (future possible) trial and impartial adjudication.
VIOLATIONS OF THE RING OF LAWYERS IN SHORTThe lawyers working on behalf of the builder and the builder controlled board have allegedly facilitated overcharging, unjust enrichment, dysfunctional registration of units to attain unjust voting power, violation of declaration which tremendously damaged interests of property of hundreds of people who bought into the project.
The allegations unanswered by the lawyers amount to suspected misconduct ranging from facilitating dishonesty to failure to fulfill their fiduciary duty.
JUST A FEW SAMPLES, ON HOW COMPLAINTS ARE NEGLECTED, CLOSED AND CASES DISMISSED BY THE LSUC. IT IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT THE LSUC MANDATE IS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC. (Click on the links)
1. Time sensitive complaints were allegedly misinterpreted and closed 3 times by Complaints Services of LSUC in the periods of Sep 2015-Jan2016. (details will be uploaded later)
2. The LSUC Intake Counselor Aleph is notified of prior misinterpretations (by previous Councillors of LSUC) prior to commencement of his review:
He is sent a copy of letter which was previously sent to Complaints Services following 3rd closing of the cases.
Counselor Aleph's manager is informed of the cases and claims she had an opportunity to review them.
3. Counselor Aleph is provided exact violations of a ring of lawyers, and even applicable chapters from the rule of professional conduct which were allegedly infringed by the ring of lawyers:
A. Requests for explanation calculation of areas and request of provisioning of architectural drawings were met with silence.
B. Unsubstantiated cease and desist (threatening) letter(s)by the lawyers used as alleged silencing techniques.
Additional complaints against the ring of lawyers (C-F, will be uploaded later) were also disregarded by the LSUC.
The cases were closed for the 4t h time (by the Counselor Aleph), no explanation was given to most concerns, but with some additional misinterpretation were done by the LSUC.
Counselor Aleph has also refused to meet with me prior to announcing his decision. I requested a meeting in order to bring large files with additional support of Lawyers wrongdoing. Those files are large and could not be sent electronically. Those files were not accepted and the cases dismissed.
The response from the Upper Management of the LSUP to the email above and my commentary.
PLEASE HELP ME TO UNDERSTAND THE MATTER, LEAVE YOUR COMMENT: